2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 287 kg more than 2002 Audi RS6.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS6 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.6 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 22 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |