2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (191 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 612 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS6 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 3802 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 59 L |