2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2004 GMC Savana is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 513 kg more than 2002 Audi RS6.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Savana. (448 Nm). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi RS6 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
| Make | Audi | GMC |
| Model | RS6 | Savana |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5326 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 448 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 2353 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3440 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 22 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 117 L |
