2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2007 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2007 Toyota Matrix is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 2007 Toyota Matrix. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2007 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 485 kg more than 2007 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Toyota Matrix. (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 2007 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | RS6 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.6 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 22 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |