2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 516 kg more than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi RS6 2008 Nissan X-Trail
Make Audi Nissan
Model RS6 X-Trail
Year Released 2002 2008
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4161 cc 2486 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 444 HP 0 HP
Torque 560 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.5 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 250 km/hour 187 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 4.9 seconds 9.9 seconds
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1910 kg 1394 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4650 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.6 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 60 L