2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2009 BMW X3
To start off, 2009 BMW X3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 2009 BMW X3. (189 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 95 kg more than 2009 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW X3. (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 2009 BMW X3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | RS6 | X3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 67 L |