2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2010 BMW 323

To start off, 2010 BMW 323 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 269 more horse power than 2010 BMW 323. (175 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 323.

Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 323. (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 323.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi RS6 2010 BMW 323
Make Audi BMW
Model RS6 323
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4161 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 444 HP 175 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 560 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.5 mm 78.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 82 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1430 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2770 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.6 L/100km 7.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 60 L