2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 204 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | RS6 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |