2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2012 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 138 kg more than 2012 Lincoln MKZ.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Lincoln MKZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi RS6 | 2012 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | RS6 | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1702 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.6 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 22 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 66 L |
