2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 201 kg more than 2013 Ferrari California.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ferrari California. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ferrari California. (504 Nm). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ferrari California.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
Make | Audi | Ferrari |
Model | RS6 | California |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 560 Nm | 504 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 78 L |