2002 Audi S3 vs. 2010 Audi S5
To start off, 2010 Audi S5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi S3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi S3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Audi S5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi S5 (333 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2002 Audi S3. (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi S5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi S3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi S5 weights approximately 532 kg more than 2002 Audi S3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi S5 (440 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi S3. (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Audi S5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi S3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi S3 | 2010 Audi S5 | |
Make | Audi | Audi |
Model | S3 | S5 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 333 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1423 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4625 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |