2002 Audi S4 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 Audi S4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi S4 (339 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (325 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 498 kg more than 2002 Audi S4.
Because 2002 Audi S4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi S4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi S4. (410 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi S4. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2002 Audi S4 has manual transmission. 2002 Audi S4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi S4 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S4 | 62 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6381 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 583 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 98.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 75 L |