2002 Audi S4 vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi S4 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi S4 (339 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2013 Volvo S60. (321 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2002 Audi S4.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (480 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi S4. (410 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi S4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi S4 | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | S4 | S60 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 480 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2776 mm |