2002 Audi S8 vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi S8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi S8 weights approximately 246 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Because 2002 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi S8 (431 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (271 Nm). This means 2002 Audi S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi S8 | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | S8 | Sable |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 431 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1504 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |