2002 Audi TT vs. 1952 Austin Princess
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin Princess weights approximately 616 kg more than 2002 Audi TT.
Because 1952 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin Princess (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi TT. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1952 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 1952 Austin Princess | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | TT | Princess |
Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 287 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 34 L |