2002 Audi TT vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,643 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Audi TT.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Crestline |
Year Released | 2002 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2940 mm |