2002 Audi TT vs. 1956 Ford F
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford F (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2002 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford F should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford F weights approximately 766 kg more than 2002 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi TT | 1956 Ford F | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | F |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2046 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3000 mm |
