2002 Audi TT vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi TT weights approximately 410 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi TT (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2540 mm |