2002 Audi TT vs. 1964 Morgan 4
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi TT weights approximately 680 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 1964 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Audi | Morgan |
Model | TT | 4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2450 mm |