2002 Audi TT vs. 1974 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,563 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1974 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1974 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 40 kg more than 2002 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Nissan Cedric (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi TT. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1974 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi TT | 1974 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |
