2002 Audi TT vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 264 (149 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 264 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 264 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2002 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 264 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi TT. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 264 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | TT | 264 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |