2002 Audi TT vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Audi TT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Audi TT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2002 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2380 mm |