2002 Audi TT vs. 2004 Bentley Arnage
To start off, 2004 Bentley Arnage is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi TT would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Bentley Arnage (401 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2002 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 1245 kg more than 2002 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Bentley Arnage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Bentley Arnage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Bentley Arnage (875 Nm @ 2150 RPM) has 665 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi TT. (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2004 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi TT. 2004 Bentley Arnage has automatic transmission and 2002 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2002 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Bentley Arnage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi TT | 2004 Bentley Arnage | |
| Make | Audi | Bentley |
| Model | TT | Arnage |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 401 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 875 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2150 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 104.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |
