2002 Audi TT vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1030 kg more than 2002 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi TT | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | E-250 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 2370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |
