2002 Audi TT vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 212 kg more than 2002 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | B3000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1552 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |