2002 Audi TT vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi TT (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi TT (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi TT | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | TT | Megane |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |