2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 1967 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2002 Bentley Arnage is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 1710 kg more than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (839 Nm) has 787 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 1967 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Bentley | ZAZ |
Model | Arnage | 966 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 886 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 839 Nm | 52 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2450 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 2170 mm |