2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2002 Bentley Arnage is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bentley Arnage (400 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1968 Ford Mustang. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm @ 2150 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Ford Mustang. (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Bentley Arnage | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bentley | Ford |
| Model | Arnage | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 835 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 101.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2750 mm |
