2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bentley Arnage (400 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (185 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 872 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Bentley Arnage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm) has 550 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (285 Nm). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | Arnage | Equinox |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 835 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 1713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 30.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 20.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 64 L |