2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2002 Bentley Arnage. (400 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2002 Bentley Arnage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm @ 2150 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac STS-V.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 2006 Cadillac STS-V | |
Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
Model | Arnage | STS-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 4376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 440 HP |
Torque | 835 Nm | 584 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 30.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 20.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 64 L |