2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (875 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | Arnage | Kodiak |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 452 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 875 Nm | 820 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2000 mm |