2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bentley Arnage (400 HP) has 282 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 1215 kg more than 2006 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Bentley Arnage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm @ 2150 RPM) has 679 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Bentley | Toyota |
Model | Arnage | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 835 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 30.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 20.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 45 L |