2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bentley Arnage (452 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2012 Ford F-350. (385 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (875 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford F-350. (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford F-350.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Bentley | Ford |
Model | Arnage | F-350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 452 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 875 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 132 L |