2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 2013 Bentley Mulsane
To start off, 2013 Bentley Mulsane is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,752 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Bentley Mulsane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Bentley Mulsane (505 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2002 Bentley Arnage. (400 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Bentley Mulsane should accelerate faster than 2002 Bentley Arnage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Bentley Mulsane (1,020 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Bentley Arnage. (835 Nm @ 2150 RPM). This means 2013 Bentley Mulsane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Bentley Arnage.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 2013 Bentley Mulsane | |
Make | Bentley | Bentley |
Model | Arnage | Mulsane |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6752 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 505 HP |
Torque | 835 Nm | 1020 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 2585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5575 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2208 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1521 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 3266 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 30.7 L/100km | 20.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 96 L |