2002 Bentley Arnage vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bentley Arnage would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Bentley Arnage. (400 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Bentley Arnage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bentley Arnage (835 Nm @ 2150 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2002 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. 2002 Bentley Arnage has automatic transmission and 2013 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Bentley Arnage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bentley Arnage | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | Arnage | Camaro |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 835 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 30.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 20.6 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 72 L |