2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 330 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (170 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 273 kg more than 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Jeep |
| Model | BZ-2001 | Compass |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6900 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 170 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1811 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2634 mm |
