2002 BMW 318 vs. 1959 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2002 BMW 318 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,380 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2002 BMW 318. (113 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 750 kg more than 2002 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 318 | 1959 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 318 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 6380 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3310 mm |