2002 BMW 318 vs. 1964 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 BMW 318 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2002 BMW 318. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 318 weights approximately 602 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 318. (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 318.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 318 | 1964 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 318 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2890 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 20.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 700 kg |