2002 BMW 318 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 BMW 318 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 318 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 2002 BMW 318 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW 318. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 318 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 318 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 202 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.5 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.6 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |
