2002 BMW 318 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 318. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 318 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 BMW 318 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 318 (113 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 318 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 318 weights approximately 730 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 318 (281 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 318 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 318 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 318 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1810 mm |