2002 BMW 320 vs. 1954 Buick 40

To start off, 2002 BMW 320 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2002 BMW 320. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2002 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 320. (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2002 BMW 320 1954 Buick 40
Make BMW Buick
Model 320 40
Year Released 2002 1954
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 5279 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 193 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4100 RPM
Torque 330 Nm 410 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 81.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 1720 kg
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3110 mm