2002 BMW 320 vs. 1965 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2002 BMW 320 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 320 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 320 | 1965 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | 320 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
