2002 BMW 320 vs. 1970 Rover P5B

To start off, 2002 BMW 320 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Rover P5B (159 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 BMW 320. (142 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Rover P5B weights approximately 290 kg more than 2002 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 320. (210 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1970 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 320. 1970 Rover P5B has automatic transmission and 2002 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 2002 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 Rover P5B will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: