2002 BMW 320 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2002 BMW 320 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 320 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 320 (210 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 320 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 320 | 102 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |