2002 BMW 320 vs. 1992 Chrysler TC
To start off, 2002 BMW 320 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler TC (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2002 BMW 320. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler TC weights approximately 81 kg more than 2002 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 320 (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 320 | 1992 Chrysler TC | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 320 | TC |
Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2370 mm |