2002 BMW 320 vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 2002 BMW 320 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2002 BMW 320. (142 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 320.
Because 2002 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW 320 (210 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2002 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 320 | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 320 | Elan |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2270 mm |