2002 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 BMW 320. (142 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 218 kg more than 2002 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 320. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2002 BMW 320 | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 320 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 74 L |