2002 BMW 320 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota

To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW 320 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2002 BMW 320. (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 320.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 320. (210 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2002 BMW 320 2010 Dodge Dakota
Make BMW Dodge
Model 320 Dakota
Year Released 2002 2010
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 3701 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 236 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 87.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 100 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3340 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 83 L