2002 BMW 330 vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2002 BMW 330 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 BMW 330. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 330. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW 330 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1953 Jaguar C-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 330. (237 Nm). This means 1953 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 330.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 330 | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 330 | C-Type |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2450 mm |
