2002 BMW 330 vs. 2000 GMC Savana

To start off, 2002 BMW 330 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Savana would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Savana (197 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 BMW 330. (193 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 330. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Savana weights approximately 700 kg more than 2002 BMW 330. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Savana (338 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW 330. (237 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW 330. 2000 GMC Savana has automatic transmission and 2002 BMW 330 has manual transmission. 2002 BMW 330 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Savana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: